Forest Simmons wrote: > Very astute observation. In elections with more than twenty or > thirty candidates, there would have to be something to fall back on > if the statistics didn't come through for us. How about: at any stage, if no candidates are eliminated, we warp right to the Approval stage? It's conceivable that an election could have 20 or 30 candidates, but in that case, I think the problem of information overloaded voters dwarfs the problem of evaluating their preferences.
- [EM] Seven +/- Two Buddha Buck
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Dave Ketchum
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Roy
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Roy
- Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
