election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2001/09/24 Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/24 Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/24 Re: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Jobst Heitzig
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Blake Cretney
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences heitzig
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] [FairVoteOR] Eugene (fwd) Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
• 2001/09/23 [EM] Dave's ranked-ballot concerns Rob LeGrand
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/23 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/22 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/22 RE: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/21 [EM] Sincere winners Craig Carey
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Richard Moore
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Craig Layton
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs Roy
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] Hello everybody! Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Roy
• 2001/09/21 [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/21 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/21 [EM] Hello everybody! heitzig
• 2001/09/20 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Craig Layton
• 2001/09/20 Re: election methods Richard Moore
• 2001/09/20 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Richard Moore
• 2001/09/20 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/20 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/20 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Roy
• 2001/09/19 [EM] Topics in Social Choice -- Book DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/19 RE: two bit ratings (was seven +/- two) DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/19 [EM] two bit ratings (was seven +/- two) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/19 [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Craig Carey
• 2001/09/19 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/19 Re: Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/19 [EM] [FairVoteOR] Eugene (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/19 Re: Seven +/- Two DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/18 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Richard Moore
• 2001/09/18 Re: Seven +/- Two DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/18 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/18 Re: [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates? Markus Schulze
• 2001/09/17 [EM] Fix of 1/4 quota 'Q' AV method (was: IFPP for more than three candidates? Craig Carey
• 2001/09/17 [EM] Ramon Lull Markus Schulze
• 2001/09/17 Re: [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates? Markus Schulze
• 2001/09/17 [EM] Factorising methods (Was: IFPP for more than three candidates? Craig Carey
• 2001/09/17 [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates? Rob LeGrand
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Richard Moore
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Craig Layton
• 2001/09/14 Re: Why 3 and not 4? Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/14 Re: [FairVoteOR] Why 3 and not 4? (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/14 Re: [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. donald
• 2001/09/13 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Richard Moore
• 2001/09/13 [EM] Participation axiom re 2nd preference alterations Craig Carey
• 2001/09/13 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Blake Cretney
• 2001/09/13 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Moe St. EverGreen
• 2001/09/13 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Anthony Simmons
• 2001/09/13 Re: Fluffy the Dog and group strategy DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/13 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Craig Layton
• 2001/09/12 Re: IFPP and Schulze comments (re [EM] Craig's posts Markus Schulze
• 2001/09/12 IFPP and Schulze comments (re [EM] Craig's posts Craig Carey
• 2001/09/11 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Richard Moore
• 2001/09/11 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
• 2001/09/11 Re: [EM] Fluffy the Dog and group strategy Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/11 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/11 [EM] Multiple Attacks on the U.S.A. DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/10 [EM] Consistency; IFPP Rob LeGrand
• 2001/09/10 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/10 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/10 Re: [EM] Seven +/- Two Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/10 [EM] Seven +/- Two Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/10 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Roy One
• 2001/09/09 [EM] Two new election books DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/07 Re: [EM] Craig's posts Markus Schulze
• 2001/09/07 [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/07 Re: [EM] Craig's posts Rob LeGrand
• 2001/09/07 Re: [EM] Craig's posts Roy
• 2001/09/06 Re: [EM] Craig's posts Richard Moore
• 2001/09/06 [EM] When 0 winners is best Roy
• 2001/09/06 Re: [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/06 [EM] Mr Ketchum: Rule on when 0 winners is best for 1 winner elections Craig Carey
• 2001/09/05 Re: [EM] Craig's posts Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/05 Re: [EM] Craig's posts Richard Moore
• 2001/09/05 [EM] Fla. Rids Itself of Punch-Card Ballots DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/05 Re: [EM] FBC (Favorite Betrayal Criterion) Definition Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/05 [EM] Craig's posts Roy One
• 2001/09/05 RE: Circular defeats [was Re: IRV is summable (a little)] DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/05 Re: [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet Craig Carey
• 2001/09/05 Re: [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/04 [EM] Fluffy the dog: rejection of Condorcet Craig Carey
• 2001/09/04 Re: [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little) Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/04 [EM] Circular defeats [was Re: IRV is summable (a little)] Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/04 Re: [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little) Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/04 [EM] Re: IRV is summable (a little) DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/04 Re: [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/04 Re: [EM] IRV is summable (a little) Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/04 Re: CR pairwise Roy
• 2001/09/04 Re: [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please Craig Carey
• 2001/09/03 [EM] Mr Simmons: provide the FBC definition please Craig Carey
• 2001/09/01 [EM] Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/01 Re: CR pairwise Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/30 Re: [EM] Political poll results Richard Moore
• 2001/08/30 Re: CR pairwise Roy
• 2001/08/30 [EM] Political poll results Rob LeGrand
• 2001/08/30 Re: CR pairwise Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/29 Re: CR pairwise Richard Moore
• 2001/08/29 Re: CR pairwise Roy One
• 2001/08/29 Re: CR pairwise Rob LeGrand
• 2001/08/29 Re: CR pairwise Roy
• 2001/08/29 Re: CR pairwise Roy
• 2001/08/28 RE: CR pairwise DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/28 [EM] CR pairwise Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/26 RE: three tier approval DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/26 Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/26 Re: [EM] Three Tier, Dyadic via CR, etc. Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/26 RE: [EM] three tier approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/26 Re: [EM] Consistency Criterion Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/25 [EM] Political party poll Rob LeGrand
• 2001/08/25 Re: [EM] Consistency Criterion Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/25 Re: [EM] New poll Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/25 Re: [EM] Three Tier, Dyadic via CR, etc. Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/25 Re: [EM] Three Tier, Dyadic via CR, etc. Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/24 Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Moe St. EverGreen
• 2001/08/23 Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Richard Moore
• 2001/08/23 Re: [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Richard Moore
• 2001/08/23 Re: [EM] three tier approval Craig Layton
• 2001/08/23 [EM] Dyadic approval implemented as CR Roy
• 2001/08/19 RE: [EM] EXAMPLES OF STV-VOTING PATHOLOGIES LAYTON Craig
• 2001/08/19 [EM] Consistency Criterion Blake Cretney
• 2001/08/18 Re: [EM] Responses to some of Forest's ideas Richard Moore
• 2001/08/18 RE: three tier approval DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/18 RE: [EM] Responses to some of Forest's ideas Rob LeGrand
• 2001/08/18 RE: EXAMPLES OF STV-VOTING PATHOLOGIES DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/17 [EM] Beatpath for dummies Roy
• 2001/08/17 [EM] EXAMPLES OF STV-VOTING PATHOLOGIES Douglas Greene
• 2001/08/16 RE: [EM] three tier approval LAYTON Craig
• 2001/08/16 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
• 2001/08/16 Re: [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Roy
• 2001/08/16 RE: three (? four) tier approval DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] Demorep's new method Anthony Simmons
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] Caltech/MIT election report URL Anthony Simmons
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] three tier approval Richard Moore
• 2001/08/15 RE: [EM] three tier approval LAYTON Craig
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] three tier approval Richard Moore
• 2001/08/15 [EM] three tier approval LAYTON Craig
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Blake Cretney
• 2001/08/15 [EM] FEC- Federal Elections 2000 (data) DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Richard Moore
• 2001/08/15 [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Roy
• 2001/08/15 [EM] Don't ignore the margins. Roy
• 2001/08/15 [EM] Ignore the margins! Roy
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Rob LeGrand
• 2001/08/15 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Roy
• 2001/08/14 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Richard Moore
• 2001/08/14 [EM] Democracy Dispatches, Number 6 (FWD) DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/14 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Blake Cretney
• 2001/08/14 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Blake Cretney
• 2001/08/14 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Roy
• 2001/08/14 [EM] U.S.A. GOVERNMENT SUMMARY MINORITY RULE MATH, 2001-2003, 14 Aug 2001 DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/13 Re: [EM] Grouping/bifurcation elimination methods Richard Moore
• 2001/08/13 Re: [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Rob LeGrand
• 2001/08/13 [EM] Politicians Wade Into Redistricting DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/13 Re: Fixing IRV DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/13 [EM] Median bifurcation using pairwise matrix Roy
• 2001/08/13 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/13 [EM] Grouping/bifurcation elimination methods Roy
• 2001/08/13 Re: [EM] Alternative counting method for RP Roy
• 2001/08/12 Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Bart Ingles
• 2001/08/12 [EM] U.S.A. HOUSE OF REPS., NOV. 2000 ELECTION, GROUPS MATH DEMOREP1
• 2001/08/12 RE: [EM] Fixing IRV LAYTON Craig
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Richard Moore
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Strategic voting in ratings Richard Moore
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Introduction (cont.) Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Maximum Consent Forest Simmons
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] A new election method... Roy
• 2001/08/09 [EM] A new election method... Buddha Buck
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Roy
• 2001/08/09 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Markus Schulze
• 2001/08/08 [EM] Maximum Consent Anthony Simmons
• 2001/08/08 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
• 2001/08/08 Re: [EM] Fixing IRV Richard Moore
• 2001/08/08 Re: [EM] Maximum Consent Blake Cretney

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]