Buddha Buck wrote: > > Hmm... I'd love to see an example of this, since I fail to see how it > could happen. I couldn't find any examples, and wouldn't mind seeing one myself, but in addition to Nurmi (who cites Young) here are a couple other mentions of the asserted incompatibility between Condorcet criterion and consistency: http://www.ucm.es/info/icae/papeles%20seminario/NSPR.pdf http://users.erols.com/aejohns/node4.htm (the latter apparently abstracted from Lorrie Faith Cranor's dissertation, available at http://lorrie.cranor.org/pubs/voting.html
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Roy One
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences heitzig
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Buddha Buck
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Jobst Heitzig
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Dave Ketchum
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
- Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
