Time to bring back Mike's idea of a poll on list conduct? Don't know why Craig keeps this up all the time. Richard
This is not response and it is not able to be understood by anybody, I am sure. You selected the root-word troll which means to wait for sexual partners. Is it going to occur to you to not repeat the same error?. I am CC-ing this to Mr Forest Simmons since I did not address the request to you. I read your message here, and it is plain to me that asking for exact information from you will be something unfulfilled. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/election-methods-list/message/7408 So far you have just indicated you want to demonstrate a disagreeable lack of clear thinking. The question is on the nature of the internal relevations that Mr Forest Simmons was writing on. My view is that the quality of Mr Simmon's responses can be likely to increase. So long as I ask no question to you (Mr Moore) it is not appropriate for me to consider the meaning of why you failed to provide any answer while presenting a response as if doing that. Although you tried to change the topic to be personal cliches as mismatching insults with facts. At 01.09.26 17:54 -0700 Wednesday, Richard Moore wrote: >Craig Carey wrote: > >> Please define "two levels". > > >Trolling again, I see. Craig can't be as clueless as he >pretends to be. > >"Two levels" is one more than a single level. > >Richard > > > > E-mail: Craig Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
