election-methods-list  

Messages by Date

• 2001/12/28 Re: [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Anthony Simmons
• 2001/12/28 Re: [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/27 [EM] automatically-changed marks. Monotonicity. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/12/27 [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Anthony Simmons
• 2001/12/27 [EM] Re: Advantages of CR style ballots DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/27 Re: [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Bart Ingles
• 2001/12/27 Re: CVD page about plurality winners (correction) Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/27 Re: [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/27 Re: CVD page about plurality winners Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/27 Re: [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Richard Moore
• 2001/12/27 Re: [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Bart Ingles
• 2001/12/27 [EM] Advantages of CR style ballots Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/27 Re: [EM] FBC ambiguity? Joe Weinstein
• 2001/12/26 Re: [EM] FBC ambiguity? Richard Moore
• 2001/12/26 [EM] FBC ambiguity? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/12/25 [EM] 2000 U.S.A. President - Electoral College Minority Rule Math DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/22 [EM] CVD page about plurality winners DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/20 Re: [EM] Generalization of Forest's problem Richard Moore
• 2001/12/19 Re: [EM] Generalization of Forest's problem Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/19 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/19 [EM] Generalization of Forest's problem Richard Moore
• 2001/12/17 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
• 2001/12/17 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/17 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/16 [EM] 2000 Electoral College -- Gore versus Bush Percentages DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/16 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
• 2001/12/14 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
• 2001/12/14 [EM] Re: Some Voting Tables DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/14 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/13 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Bart Ingles
• 2001/12/13 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
• 2001/12/13 Re: Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
• 2001/12/13 Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
• 2001/12/13 Re: Some Voting Tables DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/08 [EM] Re: Brief comments on FBC definitions DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/07 Re: [EM] simple methods' merit limit Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/06 Re: [EM] Brief comments on FBC definitions Richard Moore
• 2001/12/04 [EM] Cambridge computerized voting DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/03 [EM] Some Voting Tables DEMOREP1
• 2001/12/03 Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/03 Re: [EM] Option to vote simultaneous strips Forest Simmons
• 2001/12/03 [EM] Book Review: _Chaotic Elections_, by Donald Saari Steve Barney
• 2001/12/02 [EM] Option to vote simultaneous strips MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/12/02 [EM] Brief comments on FBC definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/11/30 Re: [EM] simple methods' merit limit Forest Simmons
• 2001/11/28 Re: [EM] simple methods' merit limit Forest Simmons
• 2001/11/27 [EM] simple methods' merit limit MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2001/11/26 Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Joseph Malkevitch
• 2001/11/26 RE: Conditional YES votes DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/26 Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Steve Barney
• 2001/11/25 [EM] LP candidate running on approval plank Bart Ingles
• 2001/11/25 Re: [EM] Conditional YES votes Richard Moore
• 2001/11/25 [EM] Conditional YES votes DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/22 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Blake Cretney
• 2001/11/21 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
• 2001/11/21 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Olli Salmi
• 2001/11/20 RE: A Cannibal Number Voting Problem DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/20 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
• 2001/11/20 [EM] A Cannibal Number Voting Problem Forest Simmons
• 2001/11/20 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Olli Salmi
• 2001/11/20 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
• 2001/11/19 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
• 2001/11/18 Re: German parliament votes for military support DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/18 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Blake Cretney
• 2001/11/16 Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
• 2001/11/16 [EM] German parliament votes for military support Jobst Heitzig
• 2001/11/14 RE: [EM] List PR (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2001/11/14 [EM] CVD -- Software for Number Voting DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/10 [EM] Electoral Systems study DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/08 Re: Reversal Symmetry Criterion & Borda-Elimination Steve Barney
• 2001/11/08 Re: Reversal Symmetry Criterion & Borda-Elimination DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/08 Re: [EM] STV bad example Forest Simmons
• 2001/11/08 Re: [EM] Reversal Symmetry Criterion & Borda-Elimination Joe Weinstein
• 2001/11/04 Re: IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/04 Re: IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff Bart Ingles
• 2001/11/03 [EM] LWV Santa Monica Election Study DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/03 Re: IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/03 [EM] Re: Software for ranked ballots story DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/03 Re: [EM] IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff Bart Ingles
• 2001/11/03 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• 2001/11/03 Re: [EM] Software for ranked ballots story Bart Ingles
• 2001/11/03 [EM] Software for ranked ballots story DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/01 [EM] Re: Super-voters ... DEMOREP1
• 2001/11/01 Re: Super-voters ... Joe Weinstein
• 2001/10/31 [EM] STATE LEGISLATURES 2001, PRESIDENT VOTES PER SEAT DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/30 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/29 [EM] Wikipedia on Voting Systems Rob Lanphier
• 2001/10/29 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/29 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/29 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/28 Re: [EM] Re: Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/28 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/28 [EM] IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff Anthony Simmons
• 2001/10/26 RE: Proxy Democracy DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/26 [EM] Proxy Democracy Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/26 [EM] IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff barnes992001
• 2001/10/26 Re: [EM] Re: Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/25 [EM] Re: Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/25 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/25 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/24 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/24 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/24 Re: Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/24 Re: Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/24 Re: [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Joe Weinstein
• 2001/10/24 Re: [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/23 [EM] Links to Election reports DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/23 Re: [EM] Low tech Condorcet Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/23 [EM] Low tech Condorcet Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/23 Re: [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/22 [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/22 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Rob LeGrand
• 2001/10/22 Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/21 [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Joe Weinstein
• 2001/10/21 [EM] Re-intro + brief review of some EM pubs Joe Weinstein
• 2001/10/19 [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/17 [EM] Science exchange (fwd) Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/12 Re: [EM] Re: spending on election equipment Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/11 [EM] Re: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/11 [EM] States with voter petitions for state constitutional amendments DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/11 Re: two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/11 [EM] Political Parties and Democracy-- new book DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/07 [EM] Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/06 Re: [EM] IRV clone-independent? Markus Schulze
• 2001/10/05 Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/05 Re: two bit ratings Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/05 Re: [EM] [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates] Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/04 Re: [EM] Policy Options, Jul-Aug 2001 Election reform articles Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/04 [EM] IRV clone-independent? Rob LeGrand
• 2001/10/03 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
• 2001/10/01 Re: [EM] Linear methods are consistent and monotonic Richard Moore
• 2001/10/01 Re: [EM] Linear methods are consistent and monotonic Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/01 [EM] IRV web site Richard Moore
• 2001/10/01 [EM] Linear methods are consistent and monotonic Richard Moore
• 2001/10/01 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Blake Cretney
• 2001/10/01 Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) DEMOREP1
• 2001/10/01 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
• 2001/10/01 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/30 RE: [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates] DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/30 [EM] Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/30 [EM] [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates] Alexander Small
• 2001/09/30 [EM] Yahoo polls Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/30 [EM] Yahoo polls - 2nd try Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/30 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Blake Cretney
• 2001/09/29 Re: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/28 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/28 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Rob Lanphier
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Richard Moore
• 2001/09/27 [EM] Policy Options, Jul-Aug 2001 Election reform articles DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/27 [EM] Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/27 Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Richard Moore
• 2001/09/26 Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Richard Moore
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Dave Ketchum
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/26 Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than a triangle Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/26 [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Richard Moore
• 2001/09/26 [EM] Could CR-style ballots help ballot measures pass? Moe St. EverGreen
• 2001/09/26 Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Richard Moore
• 2001/09/26 [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than a triangle Craig Carey
• 2001/09/26 Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Moe St. EverGreen
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list Richard Moore
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/26 [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list Craig Carey
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Blake Cretney
• 2001/09/26 [EM] Chat on "A<B=C" & "=": to avoid infinitesimals & reject use of geometry Craig Carey
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Jobst Heitzig
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
• 2001/09/26 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Anthony Simmons
• 2001/09/25 [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/25 [EM] Nomenclature Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/25 Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Buddha Buck
• 2001/09/25 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
• 2001/09/25 Re: [EM] two bit ratings Richard Moore
• 2001/09/25 Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
• 2001/09/25 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/25 [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/25 [EM] Method S92 and the new P4 rule Craig Carey
• 2001/09/25 [EM] Correction (was: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences) Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/25 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Bart Ingles
• 2001/09/24 [EM] Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs DEMOREP1
• 2001/09/24 Re: [EM] CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
• 2001/09/24 Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs Forest Simmons
• 2001/09/24 Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]