election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Some Voting Tables Forest Simmons
• [EM] Book Review: _Chaotic Elections_, by Donald Saari Steve Barney
• [EM] Option to vote simultaneous strips MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Option to vote simultaneous strips Forest Simmons
• [EM] Brief comments on FBC definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Brief comments on FBC definitions Richard Moore
• [EM] simple methods' merit limit MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] simple methods' merit limit Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] simple methods' merit limit Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] simple methods' merit limit Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Joseph Malkevitch
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Bart Ingles
  • Correction Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] math 103 website - Arrow & Saari Markus Schulze
• [EM] LP candidate running on approval plank Bart Ingles
• RE: A Cannibal Number Voting Problem DEMOREP1
• [EM] A Cannibal Number Voting Problem Forest Simmons
• Re: German parliament votes for military support DEMOREP1
• Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Olli Salmi
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Markus Schulze
• RE: [EM] List PR (fwd) Forest Simmons
  • [EM] German parliament votes for military support Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] German parliament votes for military support Olli Salmi
• [EM] CVD -- Software for Number Voting DEMOREP1
• [EM] Electoral Systems study DEMOREP1
• Re: Reversal Symmetry Criterion & Borda-Elimination DEMOREP1
  • Re: Reversal Symmetry Criterion & Borda-Elimination Steve Barney
• Re: [EM] STV bad example Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] Reversal Symmetry Criterion & Borda-Elimination Joe Weinstein
• [EM] LWV Santa Monica Election Study DEMOREP1
• Re: IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff DEMOREP1
  • Re: IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff Bart Ingles
  • Re: IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff DEMOREP1
• [EM] Re: Software for ranked ballots story DEMOREP1
• [EM] Software for ranked ballots story DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Software for ranked ballots story Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Super-voters ... DEMOREP1
• Re: Super-voters ... Joe Weinstein
• [EM] STATE LEGISLATURES 2001, PRESIDENT VOTES PER SEAT DEMOREP1
• [EM] Wikipedia on Voting Systems Rob Lanphier
• RE: Proxy Democracy DEMOREP1
• [EM] Proxy Democracy Forest Simmons
• [EM] IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff barnes992001
  • [EM] IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff Anthony Simmons
  • Re: [EM] IRV vs Plurality Vote with a Runoff Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Re: Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
• Re: Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 DEMOREP1
  • Re: Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Forest Simmons
• [EM] Links to Election reports DEMOREP1
• [EM] Low tech Condorcet Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Low tech Condorcet Forest Simmons
• [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method- Party Variant, 22 Oct 2001 Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Joe Weinstein
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Hybrid Beats-All/Approval v. Straight Approval Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re-intro + brief review of some EM pubs Joe Weinstein
• [EM] Low Tech Proxy P.R. Method DEMOREP1
• [EM] Science exchange (fwd) Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Re: spending on election equipment Forest Simmons
• [EM] States with voter petitions for state constitutional amendments DEMOREP1
• [EM] Political Parties and Democracy-- new book DEMOREP1
• [EM] IRV clone-independent? Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] IRV clone-independent? Markus Schulze
• [EM] IRV web site Richard Moore
• [EM] Linear methods are consistent and monotonic Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Linear methods are consistent and monotonic Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Linear methods are consistent and monotonic Richard Moore
• Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) DEMOREP1
  • Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Bart Ingles
• RE: [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates] DEMOREP1
• [EM] Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) DEMOREP1
  • [EM] Re: Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) DEMOREP1
• [EM] [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates] Alexander Small
  • Re: [EM] [Fwd: Possibly naive question on polarizing candidates] Bart Ingles
• [EM] Yahoo polls Bart Ingles
• [EM] Yahoo polls - 2nd try Bart Ingles
• [EM] Policy Options, Jul-Aug 2001 Election reform articles DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Policy Options, Jul-Aug 2001 Election reform articles Bart Ingles
• Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than , a triangle Buddha Buck
• [EM] Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than a triangle Forest Simmons
• [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Rob Lanphier
  • Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] [Fwd: No response was requested from you] Richard Moore
• [EM] Could CR-style ballots help ballot measures pass? Moe St. EverGreen
• [EM] More falsity: Concavity is what we want, better that than a triangle Craig Carey
• Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Moe St. EverGreen
  • Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Richard Moore
  • Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Forest Simmons
  • Re: Eugene uses Approval Voting for Referendums Richard Moore
• [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Another 20 years of the EM list Buddha Buck
• [EM] Chat on "A<B=C" & "=": to avoid infinitesimals & reject use of geometry Craig Carey
• [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences DEMOREP1
  • Re: [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nomenclature Bart Ingles
• [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Consistency, Truncation, etc. (was CR ballots, etc.) Blake Cretney
• [EM] Method S92 and the new P4 rule Craig Carey
• [EM] Correction (was: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences) Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs DEMOREP1
• Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs DEMOREP1
  • Re: Dyadic Rated Pairs Forest Simmons
• Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences DEMOREP1
  • Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
  • Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Richard Moore
  • Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences DEMOREP1
  • Re: CR style ballots for Ranked Preferences Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dave's ranked-ballot concerns Rob LeGrand
• RE: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
  • Re: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
  • Re: two bit ratings DEMOREP1
  • Re: two bit ratings Bart Ingles
  • Re: two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• [EM] Sincere winners Craig Carey
• [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs Roy
  • Re: [EM] Dyadic Rated Pairs Forest Simmons
• [EM] Hello everybody! heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Hello everybody! Forest Simmons
• Re: election methods Richard Moore
• Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Buddha Buck
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Craig Layton
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Craig Layton
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Richard Moore
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] two bit ratings Forest Simmons
• [EM] Topics in Social Choice -- Book DEMOREP1
• RE: two bit ratings (was seven +/- two) DEMOREP1
• [EM] two bit ratings (was seven +/- two) Forest Simmons
• [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Blake Cretney
  • Re: [EM] Eugene rejected 'IRV' option; vote-splitting in AV Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] [FairVoteOR] Eugene (fwd) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] [FairVoteOR] Eugene (fwd) Bart Ingles
• Re: Seven +/- Two DEMOREP1
  • Re: Seven +/- Two DEMOREP1
  • Re: Seven +/- Two Forest Simmons
• [EM] Fix of 1/4 quota 'Q' AV method (was: IFPP for more than three candidates? Craig Carey
• [EM] Ramon Lull Markus Schulze
• [EM] Factorising methods (Was: IFPP for more than three candidates? Craig Carey
• [EM] IFPP for more than three candidates? Rob LeGrand

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]