Can anybody see even one advantage that any of these low tech proxy PR variants has over Craig Layton's open list cumulative/approval method?
For Craig's PR proposal see message 7686 of the EM archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/election-methods-list/message/7686 Craig's method is just as low tech (one bit per candidate) as the suggested proxy variants, and is easily adapted [follow his EM message thread!] to give PR results as good as any existing PR method, proxy or not. As far as I can see, the only possible advantage of a proxy PR method is the convenience of just shading one bubble (to designate your proxy) and letting your proxy worry about how to actually vote. In the USA (where convenience is right up there with mom and apple pie) some of these proxy ideas just might catch on! Forest
