Richard's solution is more stable than mine in some sense because in his solution the only way that B and C can gang up to beat A is by making C's least favorite win.
By way of contrast, in my solution the two losers can gang up on the winner in such a way that the new winner is the last choice of neither confederate. On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Richard Moore wrote: > Forest Simmons wrote: > > > Actually, what I had in mind was > > > > 45 AB > > 30 BC > > 25 C > > > > Any unilateral change made by one voter or one faction will not improve > > the outcome for that voter or faction. > > > OK, that one works. We now have two (known) "stable" results, one with A > winning and one with B winning. > > > -- Richard > > >
