Ok, agreed. > Also, a poll (whose goal is to collect information) potentially has > different requirements than an election (which aims to pick the > winner).
I tried to define term "competitive" in another mail to make the difference between polls and contentious elections (http:// lists.electorama.com/pipermail/election-methods-electorama.com/2006- October/018710.html). I think there is a continuum between these two extremes. When discussing Pizza preferences competitiveness=0.1. When deciding which Pizza to buy competitiveness=0.4. When electing a president competitiveness=0.8. When deciding who gets eliminated from a 1M$ competition in TV competitiveness=0.98. Some election methods are robust enough so that competitiveness has no big impact on them (typically all vote sincerely or according to some basic well known strategy). Some election methods need low competitiveness levels to work. Some election methods may change their behaviour depending on the situation (the Ranked Preferences try to do this a bit - stronger preferences can be used also for defensive purposes - e.g. by voters who fear that the remaining strategic vulnerabilities of Condorcet might harm them). Juho Laatu On Oct 31, 2006, at 17:33 , Kevin Venzke wrote: > Juho, > > --- Juho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >> On Oct 29, 2006, at 23:26 , Kevin Venzke wrote: >>> So it seems to me that there are a couple of necessary conditions >>> for Range to be a good method for decision-making: >>> 1. that the vast majority of voters care about reaching a consensus >>> result, and will not throw this priority out when they realize that >>> voters can and will undermine this result in their own favor >>> AND >>> 2. that voters lack some other way of learning what the other voters >>> want. >> >> Couldn't there be also some really friendly elections / polls where >> condition 2 is compromised but Range still works. E.g. "I already >> know what Adam and Bob think about this since I asked them, but it is >> still really interesting to see the total results of what ice cream >> flavour our group thinks is the best". > > I'm not saying Range wouldn't work if voters are informed about the > other voters' preferences, just that in such a case it is not as > important for the voter to be able to moderate his own influence. > > Also, a poll (whose goal is to collect information) potentially has > different requirements than an election (which aims to pick the > winner). > > Kevin Venzke > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > _____ > Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos > questions ! > Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des > internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses > http://fr.answers.yahoo.com > ---- > election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for > list info Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ---- election-methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
