On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Kathy Dopp wrote:

Is the Condorcet method susceptible to the phenomena of a
nonwinning candidate whose presence in the election changes who would
otherwise win the election, all else being equal?


i changed the sentence form into a question. i hope that was okay, Kathy. don't wanna misquote anyone.

i think that the answer is "no", if a Condorcet winner exists and that all bets are off if a CW does not exist, except, perhaps for these "strategy-resistant" methods such as Markus Schulze's method. i sorta understand it, but since he hangs here, i think Markus should address the question if the Schulze method is spoiler free.


Could someone please provide me with an example of the spoiler effect occuring with the Condorcet method of counting rank choice ballots or tell me why the spoiler effect doesn't happen with Condorcet in a few words?

in the ranked-order ballot, no matter what their absolute ranks are, if A is ranked above B (or A is ranked while B is not), that counts as a vote for A. likewise for B ranked above A. doesn't matter if they were ranked 4th and 5th.

just like the IRV final round between A and B, Condorcet will total how many votes with A>B and compare that to votes where B>A. whether C is in the race or not, for each individual ballot, if A>B with C on the ballot, A would continue to be ranked above B (whether C is higher than either, in between, or below either). with the meaning of every ballot, regarding A and B, unchanged (whether C is there or not), the vote counts for A>B and B>A do not change. so every Condorcet tally not involving candidate C will remain unchanged, the tallies involving C are not there if C is removed.

if A (or whoever is not C) was the Condorcet winner before C was removed, then the A>X tally exceeds X>A for any X. then A would continue to be ranked over all of the other remaining candidates with the same tallies as before even with C removed, because every tally not involving C would remain unchanged.

i would say that (with the CW existing), it's spoiler-proof.


Thanks. I'm devising an experiment to compare the Condorcet method
with the IRV method of counting rank choice ballots and would like, if
possible, to introduce subjects to the spoiler effect to see under
what conditions they notice it occurs.

do you want me to tell you how it occurred in Burlington in 2009?

--

r b-j                  [email protected]

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."




----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to