I don't know Burlington geography or politics. But the city council
returns make it appear that turnout was much higher in the two wards
where IRV lost than in the five wards where IRV won. If that is at least
roughly the case, was there something about the city council contests or
candidates that would account for such a difference in turnout?
--Bob Richard
robert bristow-johnson wrote:
Well, that's sad. Even with a sorta narrow victory the anti-IRVers
will swagger down Church Street like they own the place. We will now
all accept that God instituted the "traditional ballot" for use
forever and that a 40% Plurality is a "winner".
It would have been optimum if IRV survived this vote by a narrow margin.
It's sad that when FairVote introduced and promoted the ranked ballot
that, from square 1, they always coupled it to the IRV tabulation of
votes. When enough disasters (at least anomalies) happen like in
Burlington or Aspen, some backlash, both ignorant and enlightened, is
bound to happen.
--
r b-j r...@audioimagination.com
"Imagination is more important than knowledge."
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list
info
--
Bob Richard
Executive Vice President
Californians for Electoral Reform
PO Box 235
Kentfield, CA 94914-0235
415-256-9393
http://www.cfer.org
----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
