On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:58 AM, Kristofer Munsterhjelm wrote:

robert bristow-johnson wrote:
Well, that's sad. Even with a sorta narrow victory the anti- IRVers will swagger down Church Street like they own the place. We will now all accept that God instituted the "traditional ballot" for use forever and that a 40% Plurality is a "winner". It would have been optimum if IRV survived this vote by a narrow margin. It's sad that when FairVote introduced and promoted the ranked ballot that, from square 1, they always coupled it to the IRV tabulation of votes. When enough disasters (at least anomalies) happen like in Burlington or Aspen, some backlash, both ignorant and enlightened, is bound to happen.

I think that shows that IRV is just not good enough. Of course, I could be wrong: perhaps it is, as you said, an outcome on par with "Bush wins the presidency -- in the supreme court",

here is a funny story from The Onion (about a year old):

 http://www.theonion.com/content/news/supreme_court_overturns_bush_v

but if it was IRV itself that gave the opposition enough proverbial ammunition, then that does count against the method.

Since I prefer Condorcet, I would say that a good method should have elected Montroll. IRV didn't.

What's really bad is that now people will probably think that the ranked ballot and IRV are one and the same - that the only way to conduct a ranked ballot election is by using IRV.

i've been saying that myself, many times. to a lot of deaf ears in Burlington.

What method will be used in Burlington now -- Plurality or runoff? Since you said 40% earlier, I guess it's a runoff, but 40% sounds odd as a runoff threshold. Shouldn't it be majority? Anything less and the voters might have preferred someone else.

it's Plurality winner if 40% is reached. if no one gets 40%, it's a runoff in about 3 weeks between the top two. if applied in 2009, the runoff would be between the same two candidates, and there is a good possibility that, with reduced turnout at the runoff, the election would have come out differently.

--

r b-j                  [email protected]

"Imagination is more important than knowledge."




----
Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info

Reply via email to