2013/6/17 Benjamin Grant <[email protected]> > *From:* Jameson Quinn [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, June 17, 2013 1:25 PM > > *Subject:* Re: Participation Criteria and Bucklin - perhaps they *can* > work together after all?**** > > ** ** > > So to make a ranked example:**** > > ** ** > > 49: XpqYrstuabcdef**** > > 49: XutYsrpqfedcba**** > > 50: abcYXdefpqrstu**** > > 50: fedYXcbautsrpq**** > > ** ** > > OK, Y wins this one.**** > > ** ** > > Add 4 votes:**** > > 4: aXYbcdefpqrstu**** > > ** ** > > And now X wins this one. **** > > ** ** > > BUT I’m am still confused, Participation Criterion says: “*Adding one or > more ballots that vote X over Y should never change the winner from X to Y > *” In this case the winner was NOT changed from X to Y, but from Y to X, > so this is NOT an example of failing the Participation Criteria, is it?*** > * > > ** ** > > Am I missing something here?**** > > ** >
Oops, typo on my part. The additional 4 votes should be aYXbcdefpqrstu. Jameson > ** > > -Benn Grant**** > > eFix Computer Consulting**** > > [email protected]**** > > 603.283.6601**** >
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
