2013/6/17 Benjamin Grant <[email protected]> > Is **this** an example of Bucklin failing Participation?**** > > ** ** > > 5: A>B>C**** > > 4: B>C>A**** > > ** ** > > A wins >
Right > **** > > ** ** > > But add these in:**** > > 2: C>A>B**** > > ** ** > > B wins. > Yes, with your "tiebreaker". Good job. But for other Bucklin "tiebreakers", you might have to change this scenario some. For instance, in ranked ¿DAT?, this example doesn't work, as A still wins after the added votes. However, ranked ¿DAT? still fails participation in the more-complex scenario I gave earlier. Jameson > **** > > ** ** > > If I didn’t make any mistakes, is this the failing of strictly ranked > Bucklin versus Participation?**** > > ** ** > > -Benn Grant**** > > eFix Computer Consulting**** > > [email protected]**** > > 603.283.6601**** > > ** ** >
---- Election-Methods mailing list - see http://electorama.com/em for list info
