Le jeudi 21 juin 2007 à 07:29 -0500, Jason Simanek a écrit : > I am in complete agreement. From a professional designing background, > this mailing list process is worse than dealing with the bad approval > processes at my job. > > I think a small design group should be assembled, the group will decide > on a creative director, have closed conversations about the different > design projects as they come up and then the group will present three > design options to the community. Designing by committee is always very > slow and having everyone's input at every step can be very frustrating > and usually leads to poor designs. > > I think letting the community vote on two to three variations prepared > by the design group is the way to efficiently proceed forward. In any > organization it is important for those involved to recognize their > strengths and weaknesses. > > Thanks for listening, > > Jason Simanek
Yes, this sounds like a good idea, I think however that this "design group" discussions archives should be kept somewhere public. Asking the community to vote on a restricted pre-determined set of propositions would surely lead to more constructive solutions :) Philippe
