On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:36 PM, Zinggi <schrott57...@gmail.com> wrote:
> These are some very good points.
> I don't see how a library that doesn't store functions in the model could 
> deal with these situations as easy as your library does.

Right there may be the argument for why keeping functions out of the model 
while possibly useful as a guideline is likely to be a problem if applied as a 
more hard and fast rule.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to