On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:36 PM, Zinggi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> These are some very good points.
> I don't see how a library that doesn't store functions in the model could 
> deal with these situations as easy as your library does.

Right there may be the argument for why keeping functions out of the model 
while possibly useful as a guideline is likely to be a problem if applied as a 
more hard and fast rule.

Mark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm 
Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to