On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Wouter In t Velt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any feedback would be welcome! > > You're trading one set of boilerplate for another. Both your versions are almost as bad as you are forcing internal details of the functioning of the dropdown onto the user of the dropdown. The pure version is indeed more aligned with the current recommendations but it is almost as bad from a library user point of view. In the 5 months since this pattern emerged I have not seen an explosion of "not-a-component" libraries that follow it. In order to have a full treatment of the issue, implement a webcomponents/polymer version of the same functionality and then argue that the "pure" version is better. -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
