I just pushed the latest changes and the functionality should be equivalent. https://github.com/pdamoc/polymer-exploration
I have paid very little thought to the Dropdown's API and so it's bad but... it get's the job done. Also, I was getting some weird JSON errors when I tried to use official `onIronSelect` and so I just hacked everything to use the onClick. These hacks are less important right now as this is the job of the library developer. >From a library user point of view however, I think that the web-components version is remarkably better. With a battery of great looking and easy to combine components like these, one could quickly implement great looking layouts AND, more importantly, quickly alter them without having to change code in multiple places. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Wouter In t Velt <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow you guys are fast! > Hopefully I can dive into it tonight (@work right now). > > I think it would be really interesting to see a webcomponents version of > the same example and compare it with the other two versions. > > In the meantime, do let me know if there's anything I could improve about > my other implementation of the 2 versions. > You are no doubt way more seasoned in Elm than I am, so I am sure my code > can be improved. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- There is NO FATE, we are the creators. blog: http://damoc.ro/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
