Agreed. I wanted this just the other day as well. For similar reasons, it would also be nice to have an “official” Html.none rather than just using Html.text “”.
Mark On Jan 24, 2017, 3:51 PM -0800, OvermindDL1 <[email protected]>, wrote: > Yes, for precisely the same usage. It is much easier to swap between > something and `none` then it it to do list building with if conditions. I > made my own by using a dummy attribute name that should 'never be used' > (*cough*) of "nonenonenone". > > A side effect is the vdom checking is a little more efficient if more than 1 > set of things change at once since the overall 'shape' of the vdom does not > change. ^.^ > > > On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 3:21:31 PM UTC-7, Robert Lee wrote: > > Would anyone else find --Html.Attributes.none-- useful? > > > > none : Html.Attribute a > > > > Use cases look like the following. > > > > .... > > > > view: Model -> Html.Html Msg > > let > > onClickButton = > > case model.isClickedAlready of > > True -> > > Html.Events.onClick Submit > > > > False -> > > Html.Attributes.none > > in > > Div [onClickButton] .... > > > > ..... > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Elm Discuss" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
