> I'm curious what makes it sound that way, since as you noted, that is not >>> the point I'm making. >>> >> >> I don't know if others feels like me or not. But at least for me, "no >> components" sounds a bit confusing (it is in official guide too). >> > > I view it as destructive so, you're not alone in seeing something not OK > with that. >
It's responsible to call out alluring antipatterns that consistently lead people to pain. I'm sorry if you dislike that, but it's important. :) Other than the update trick, it's more or less the same thing as the old > MUV triplets. > You can even use the pattern to do nesting. > "You literally can do this and it will compile" is not much of a pitch for a more complex alternative to the simpler approach that already works well <https://www.reddit.com/r/elm/comments/5jd2xn/how_to_structure_elm_with_multiple_models/dbkpgbd/>. ;) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
