On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 2:27:49 PM UTC+1, Wojtek Piekutowski wrote: > > The number of similar voices regarding community process and amount of > frequently requested missing features/native libraries (like binary support > and better JS interop) show a problem. No matter how amazing and performant > Elm will ever be, newcomers will be discouraged by everlasting begging for > native APIs support. > > Does anybody has an idea how other languages/platforms manage to get > community involved? I think it could be beneficial to learn from, for > example Elixir community, and borrow some good practices that could work > for Elm too. >
ZeroMQ was hugely successful. I worked on Apache Qpid AMQP in corporate sponsored context but sadly I only joined shortly after Hintjens left the project, in part due to a distasteful interaction with one of the other project sponsors that was very proprietary in its nature. This probably influenced his attitude to community in ZeroMQ. http://hintjens.com/blog:95 Worth a read and the other blog posts by him around the community process - I'm not saying this is perfect for Elm, just worth reading. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
