On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 7:55:22 PM UTC+1, Ian Mackenzie wrote: > > So, nice library with lots of features, missed chance to work with a >> better abstraction. >> > > Ouch =) I've done lots of work with matrix-based libraries, and I've > personally found matrices (and related stuff like quaternions) very > powerful and flexible but also confusion- and error-prone. The OpenSolid > libraries are my attempt to provide a better, more geometrically meaningful > abstraction that still allows you to get good performance. >
Sorry, my bad and thanks for the explanation. I guess I was a little fixated on the matrix approach, but with your explanation it is clear that your approach is at least as good. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to elm-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
