On Friday, May 5, 2017 at 7:55:22 PM UTC+1, Ian Mackenzie wrote: > > So, nice library with lots of features, missed chance to work with a >> better abstraction. >> > > Ouch =) I've done lots of work with matrix-based libraries, and I've > personally found matrices (and related stuff like quaternions) very > powerful and flexible but also confusion- and error-prone. The OpenSolid > libraries are my attempt to provide a better, more geometrically meaningful > abstraction that still allows you to get good performance. >
Sorry, my bad and thanks for the explanation. I guess I was a little fixated on the matrix approach, but with your explanation it is clear that your approach is at least as good. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Elm Discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
