Simon Wright wrote:
And yes, github looks like the natural place; the tools for managing
forks look good, at least as far as I've tried them.
I've just had fun setting up a Github repo.
Process: building on my normal workflow (sync with mtn; hg convert to
a Mercurial repo), I've converted to git using hg-fast-export,
removed
non-relevant branches, run the tests, and pushed to Github.
I think I may have gone too far, by removing the opentoken and
fasttoken branches ..?
And I'm not sure whether you (Stephe) want to keep all your
development branches?
And I may be committing a sin by naming the master branch
org.emacs.ada-mode rather than just master>
Anyway, see what you think. I can always start over if necessary!
(almost forgot -
https://github.com/simonjwright/org.emacs.ada-mode.git)
Don't put unrelated branches in the same git repository. ("unrelated"
means
no parent-child relationship between revisions). git is designed so
that
one repo is meant to contain only one project; like mercurial but
unlike
monotone, which is one of the reasons I like monotone so much :)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
_______________________________________________
Emacs-ada-mode mailing list
[email protected]
http://host114.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/emacs-ada-mode_stephe-leake.org
