On 8 May 2008, at 12:45, Adrian Robert wrote:
Do they really stand in the way of a merge?For various reasons, yes. Also, as you point out, there is the Carbon work, which should also be done beforehand. Both because of prevailing opinion on emacs-devel
Fact is that the Carbon maintainer is not interested in keeping Carbon alive on the 23 branch. He might be convinced otherwise, but I don't see how the Carbon port should delay your merge!
and because the merge would bring a lot more Carbon users with their expectations.
Why would that be so? We're talking about a merge on the current HEAD (23 branch).This will not give you more users from Carbon Emacs Package or Aquamacs, only from Emacs.app people if you so choose. And users are a good thing: they find bugs.
(In my earlier e-mail, I didn't say I was going to do an Aquamacs release based on Cocoa after it's been merged. Aquamacs (and Carbon Emacs) are both based on the 22 branch at this point.)
Could someone who is familiar with the mac-* variables post a summary of them? Or even better, a patch to ns-win.el adding aliases for corresponding ns-* variables..
Their Doc strings are good, but I'm more than happy to explain missing details. I'd be happy to provide these aliases once it's checked into the Emacs 23 CVS.
- D
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Emacs-app-dev- mailing list Emacs-app-dev-@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emacs-app-dev-
