"Eli Zaretskii" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: Nick Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:23:50 +1300 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On a related note (or possibly unrelated), if you type "C-h i d m >> elisp RET", then "i system-type RET", shouldn't you see the full >> list of the possible values of that variable. I see no mention of >> darwin. Is this deliberate? > > If `darwin' is the value on some supported system, its omission > cannot be deliberate, I think.
Secondguessing will get us nowhere: by that we just cement possible oversights permanently. Policy by accident, "somebody might have thought something when doing that", is a recipe for disaster in the long run. AFAICS, Darwin is free software (while MacOSX isn't). So even if we try to be semi-"politically correct" by deliberately making using unfree software more complicated with buggy documentation, more likely window-system rather than system-type should be affected. If there was a rationale, I'd prefer hearing instead of guessing it. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
