Piet van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kim F. Storm) (KFS) wrote: > >>KFS> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> Juri Linkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> >>>>> 2. goto-line is not too frequent command to deserve the sole >>>>> M-g key. There are many other goto-related commands that could >>>>> share the same mnemonics and have the common M-g prefix key. >>>> >>>> Forget it. No precedence, > >>KFS> Huh? M-g was a prefix key before the change... > > Was it? In gnus it is bound to gnus-summary-rescan-group. At least in the > version a month or so ago.
I'm talking about the global binding, not some buffer local binding. IMO, the gnus M-g binding should definitely be removed in the *Article* buffer, as is makes good sense to use goto-line to another buffer based on a file:linenumber found in a mail message (e.g. a backtrace in a bug report). The M-g binding can remain in gnus summary buffers if people prefer... -- Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
