> The difficulty in finding a long name for it reflected a lack of
> apparent coherence of the functionality of the option. Nobody could
> see what it was good for. That is why I thought of removing it or
> changing it.
Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs.
After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal
is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you
would normally like to have for daily work.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
