> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:54:35 +0200 > From: Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I, for one, would much prefer yearly releases of medium-high > quality than fourth-year releases of insuperable quality.
I'd prefer yearly releases of insuperable quality ;-) > YMMV. It does. > Last time we discusses that I brought the example of Subversion (and > was said it was a much smaller project :). I know. But they do > something which I find quite interesting: they plan a release, and > they try hard to stick to the date, even if they *know* it won't be > perfect. They're not afraid of getting 1.2.0 out even if they know > about non-critical bugs; 1.2.1 will follow in a few weeks. I think > this generates good karma. I think it's plain foolish to release a version that is known to be flawed. It hurts users and it wastes valuable resources that are at a premium on preparing tarballs that would need to be replaced shortly. But that's me. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
