On 7/21/05, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the last part not only is strange because (featurep 'emacs) is never used > (since Emacs does not provide the `emacs' feature)
Yeah, I pointed this out in a message a few days ago. Perhaps it'd be useful to define the feature 'emacs, but even so it won't be a reliable way to detect GNU Emacs for years and years... > but also because it tries > to handle (featurep 'xemacs) even though that's already handled in > byteopt.el where we do: I think the handling in byteopt.el is about generating bytecode (or not doing it, for XEmacs-specific code) while the one in bytecomp.el is about not issuing warnings for XEmacs features. For example, it silences a warning in flymake.el about the use of `multiple-value-bind'. -- /L/e/k/t/u _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel