On 7/21/05, Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the last part not only is strange because (featurep 'emacs) is never used
> (since Emacs does not provide the `emacs' feature)
Yeah, I pointed this out in a message a few days ago. Perhaps it'd be
useful to define the feature 'emacs, but even so it won't be a
reliable way to detect GNU Emacs for years and years...
> but also because it tries
> to handle (featurep 'xemacs) even though that's already handled in
> byteopt.el where we do:
I think the handling in byteopt.el is about generating bytecode (or
not doing it, for XEmacs-specific code) while the one in bytecomp.el
is about not issuing warnings for XEmacs features. For example, it
silences a warning in flymake.el about the use of
`multiple-value-bind'.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
