2005/9/13, Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > And how stable / bug-free is unicode-2 > right now compared with the will-become-22.1 code?
I use unicode-2 as my "secondary" emacs, and it seems pretty stable, more or less identical to the trunk. The main problems I've had seem to mostly be related to font selection, e.g., where unicode-2 will choose a worse X font to display a character than the trunk would have; however I presume in your case you probably will not use the X font selection code anyway. > What I'm getting > at is, is it reasonable to port Emacs-on-Aqua to this branch now, or > should I stick with the to-be-22.1 code If the unicode-2 branch would make your job much easier, I think going with the branch would be a perfectly reasonable thing to do. > or perhaps just wait before starting anything? I see no particular reason to wait; my impression is that by-and-large, the unicode-2 branch is not going to change dramatically. Kenichi can give a more knowledgable answer however. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
