> > That does beg the question as to why unicode-2 hasn't already been > > merged into HEAD given that, using timescales for Emacs 22, Emacs 23 > > won't be released until about 2010. > > So that Emacs 22 will not get released only in 2010.
The description Miles gave suggested that unicode-2 was already usable. The plan, as I understand it, is to merge unicode-2 to HEAD immediately after Emacs 22 is released. It will then presumably sit in CVS for years while a myriad of other features are added. Nick _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel