> > That does beg the question as to why unicode-2 hasn't already been
 > > merged into HEAD given that, using timescales for Emacs 22, Emacs 23
 > > won't be released until about 2010.
 > 
 > So that Emacs 22 will not get released only in 2010.

The description Miles gave suggested that unicode-2 was already usable.  The
plan, as I understand it, is to merge unicode-2 to HEAD immediately after
Emacs 22 is released.  It will then presumably sit in CVS for years while a
myriad of other features are added.

Nick


_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

Reply via email to