Miles Bader writes: > I use unicode-2 as my "secondary" emacs, and it seems pretty stable, > more or less identical to the trunk.
and > my impression is that > by-and-large, the unicode-2 branch is not going to change > dramatically. That does beg the question as to why unicode-2 hasn't already been merged into HEAD given that, using timescales for Emacs 22, Emacs 23 won't be released until about 2010. Nick _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
