Jan Malakhovski <o...@oxij.org> writes: > Okay, so I bisected and found that the offender is > 9f5e698679aecbed872a2030e4157e5e2b1d87e0. Since then these lines have > changed, so the following
[...] > I'm willing to listen, but I seriously doubt there's such a compelling > argument defending the change. Even when out of `org-agenda-list` in > plain `org-agenda`, jumping to SCHEDULED or DEADLINE lines is nicer than > to the heading itself. I don't know either why that was changed, but there probably was a reason for it. Bastien may remember it. Regards,
