Jan Malakhovski <o...@oxij.org> writes: > I'm pretty sure that there are other org-mode users that are weeping > silently since that change. Suppose you have more than a screen of clock > lines in LOGBOOK under a heading (I have headings that have thousands). > (org-agenda-goto) before 9f5e698679aecbed872a2030e4157e5e2b1d87e0 is > very helpful when moving CLOCK lines between headings (think "refile > CLOCK line") or editing overlaps or gaps: you <Tab> or click on the > heading and here you are at the CLOCK, but after > 9f5e698679aecbed872a2030e4157e5e2b1d87e0 you have to *retype* the date > and time into search, which is annoying to say the least.
Try typing RET in the agenda. That calls org-agenda-switch-to, which brings you to the relevant clock information in the agenda. (However, if the information is tucked away in a LOGBOOK, it remains somewhat inconveniently hidden from view). > I'm willing to listen, but I seriously doubt there's such a compelling > argument defending the change. Even when out of `org-agenda-list` in > plain `org-agenda`, jumping to SCHEDULED or DEADLINE lines is nicer than > to the heading itself. I disagree that jumping to the SCHEDULED or DEADLINE lines from a normal agenda is always nicer than jumping to the headline. I can easily change planning info from within the agenda. But I cannot change the text of the headline itself -- that is usually why I jump from the agenda. If nothing else, we should have both options, which we seem to currently have with the difference between TAB (org-agenda-goto) and RET (org-agenda-switch-to). However, I am not sure how intentional this is, as I can find nothing highlighting this difference in the documentation. Best, Matt