On 2016-10-10 10:17, Nick Dokos wrote: > Clément Pit--Claudel <clement....@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 2016-10-07 22:38, Adam Porter wrote: >>> I understand the motivation for making this change, but I respectfully >>> request that this be made configurable. I much prefer the "clean" links >>> without visible brackets, and adding them would seem like a regression >>> to me. I'm guessing that many current Org users would also prefer to >>> keep the brackets invisible. >> >> Adam, what do you think of my earlier suggestion (displaying the >> brackets when the pointer is on them, hiding them otherwise? (In the >> style of prettify-symbols-mode with unprettify-symbol-at-point) >> > > I don't particularly care whether the brackets are shown or not, but I > dislike things that change the visual appearance as you roll over > them.
Note that by pointer I meant point, not mouse; IOW, pointing on something with your mouse would not change anything display-wise. I'm not sure what you meant by roll-over. > The web is full of such things and they drive me bananas: you > are trying to read something and you roll over something in the text > that changes its appearance, possibly shifting the text that you are > reading and leaving you to chase it around the page - good bye, > concentration. Even if you do it by just switching visibility on the > brackets, it's distracting when you are reading; it might be helpful > when composing but I'm not convinced even for that. Agreed. I'd be curious to get feedback from users of prettify-symbols-mode, too. And to know whether your objections apply as strongly to just revealing the brackets when the point is on them (not when they are being moused over) Cheers, Clément.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
