Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@gmail.com> writes: > My view on this is bare-bones download, in a spirit of org-attach > itself. There is already 'url method in org-attach-attach, but it is > hard-coded to url-retrieve-synchronously. It would be handy if user > could configure alternative retrievers (like monolith, wget, curl, or > some user-defined function).
Thanks. I'm learning about this for the first time after using org-attach for years! I have no idea why I've never noticed it. > Note that monolith does not crawl the website. It only collects > everything needed to show the page as you see it in browser into single > html file. This behaviour is what one expects to obtain when saving a > full web-page from browser. Agreed. This looks like the way to go. Keep it simple and abstract the call to url-copy-file to allow the user to configure the command for downloading the page/file. Best, Matt
