On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:01 AM Denis Maier <denisma...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > >> I think a plain "p" in front of a number is not recognized as a locator > >> prefix. > >> Nicolas's post mentions "page", "p.", "pp." as valid locator terms for > >> page. So in your case this here seems to apply: "The part of the suffix > >> before the locator is appended to reference's prefix." > > > > I missed the significance of that last part. > > > > What's the use case there Nicolas? > > This was ported from Citeproc Org library. I don't think there's a use > case, but that information should not be dropped silently, so it's a way > to do "something" about it.
OK, I guess the question is for Andras then. I was expecting (not to say I should have necessarily) in this case: [cite:@doe p23] ... that either "p23" is recognized as a locator, or as a suffix string for the citation reference. I'm having a hard time understanding why one would want that "p" to be added to the prefix. Andras? Anyone else? Bruce
