On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:18 AM Bruce D'Arcus <bdar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was expecting (not to say I should have necessarily) in this case: > > [cite:@doe p23] > > ... that either "p23" is recognized as a locator, or as a suffix > string for the citation reference. To be clear, Nicolas, your change to the regex this today, however, does recognize that as a locator, so this specific example is a non-issue ATM. I am still curious about the behavior though. Bruce
