"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > Right now, citeproc-el, and hence also oc-csl, only supports the "bare" > variant. > > Would it be feasible, and make sense, to fall back all "bare" variants > to "bare" for now? > > So this: > > [cite//bare-caps:@latexcompanion] > > ... would render as: > > Doe 2019
We dropped variant inheritance some time ago already, when the suggested syntax was style/variant/subvariant... Now, "bare" and "bare-caps" are totally different from Org Cite POV. I'd rather not re-introduce this. Maybe "bare" need to be promoted as a full-fledged style, so "bare/caps" could fallback to "bare". I don't know. Regards,
