Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 05/10/2021 23:32, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Max Nikulin writes:
>> I tried come up with the reason why org-no-popup was used in the
>> initial
>> implementation. I think, the reason is avoiding situation like what you
>> may see after running
>> (let ((pop-up-frames t)) (funcall-interactively #'org-goto))
>> So, removing the macro completely is not a good idea.
>> I have updated the patch that should work without dropping the
>> macro.
>> See the attached.
>
> Thank you, Ihor.
>
> Your updated patch works in default configuration (-Q). I am not
> familiar with knobs of `display-buffer' function so I have no idea if
> someone may complain that such variant overrides his setup or works
> incorrectly with his preferences.
Please note the documentation of variable `pop-up-windows'.
This variable is provided mainly for backward compatibility and
should not be used in new code.
The same holds for `pop-up-frames'.
The drop of the macro looks like a good idea to me. Can someone please
describe the price for dropping macro `org-no-popups'?
@Ihor I do not understand what "situation" you mean.
