Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes:
> Morgan Smith <morgan.j.sm...@outlook.com> writes:
>
>> Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes:
>>
>>> But then `org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-deadline-is-shown' does not look
>>> like the right place for this customization. It would make more sense to
>>> have a dedicated custom variable for this. WDYT?
>>> ..
>> I can't quite remember at this point but I'm pretty sure some
>> permutations are impossible with the current setup (like ignoring both
>> things that are scheduled today and in the future when the deadline is
>> today).
>
> Your statement does not look like something related to my question about
> moving 'repeated-after-deadline value to some other (existing or new)
> customization.
>
By adding another variable to control the 'repeated-after-deadline'
behavior, we would allow the user to combine this behavior with the
other behaviors of 'org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-deadline-is-shown'.
This would allow for more permutations. This is a point in favor of
adding a dedicated custom variable.
>
> Or did you mean to provide a generic suggestion about adding more agenda
> customizations?
>
Maybe we could create some data-structure that represents an agenda and
allow the user to manipulate that directly. I'm not really a fan of
having a ton of variables controlling the agenda. Although I imagine I
might gain some respect for it if I tried to implement this feature.
>
> Nothing is stagnated. I am just waiting for Bastien to chime in, if he
> decides to. He is the person who can provide important context.
> We allow up to one month for people to reply on the mailing list.
> See https://orgmode.org/worg/org-mailing-list.html#org474747a
>
I was unaware of the one month policy. Thank you for letting me know.
Due to that lack of a bug tracking system I have a fear that things on
the mailing list would get lost. Maybe this fear is unfounded?
