Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > Fair enough. I tend to have dozens of projects that have to be running > in parallel and prioritized depending on deadlines or new information > arriving. So, I personally need an elaborate setup of project priorities > and statuses. So, I use todo keywords on projects just like on tasks; > for the same purposes.
I see, but for me that would blur the line between project and task. A "project" is open and running and contains tasks. A project does not have a due date, it inherits the due date of the last task if it has to stop at some point, I have a "Work" project and ~10 personal projects. >> - STRT tasks do not change often: they are either STRT or DONE (hence >> the need for dedicated agenda views). > > I personally prefer DOING. IMHO, it creates a better sense that the task > must be progressed further. Agreed. I followed Rudolf's advice in this thread and now use "ONGO", which conveys what I need now. -- Bastien
