Rens Oliemans <[email protected]> writes: > The FSF approach recommends this: > > "A GNU program should not recommend, promote, or grant legitimacy to the > use > of any nonfree program. [...] we can and should refuse to advertise them > to > new potential customers, or to give the public the impression that their > existence is legitimate." > > -- https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#References
I feel this isn't intended to be the case for links which represent an authoritative source for what is relevant. For example, https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/vertico.html links to https://github.com/minad/vertico with no alternatives provided and no disclaimers. If GNU package infrastructure isn't doing anything special then I don't see why the packages themselves should be treated any differently. -- Morgan Willcock
