Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > I think that it will be against the spirit of the code safety system we > have in place. The recommended way to get rid of the question you are > annoyed with is disabling `org-confirm-babel-evaluate'. > > Also, see https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87edsd5o89.fsf@localhost/
Would it be possible to summarize the reason? The linked thread is too long for me to study now. I get why C-c C-c asks for confirmation, but why does C-c C-v C-e do it? If I type that key binding, is my intention not clear for Org? Perhaps we could at least improve the user interface with Yes/No/Always and then briefly flash "Customize `org-confirm-babel-evaluate' to save your choice". Still, I would prefer no questions if (and only if) I request code execution explicitly. > Maybe. Or, alternatively, babel backends can put appropriate autoload > cookies. I think it would be nice if at least the built-in languages worked OOTB, with no `org-babel-do-load-languages` and `org-babel-load-languages` ceremonies. What would have to be auto-loaded for that? Rudy -- "To the unknown journeyman I promise to show courage in upholding my vows What is an adventure if not the commitment to keep going?" --- Protesilaos Stavrou, To the unknown journeyman, 2025 Rudolf Adamkovič <[email protected]> [he/him] http://adamkovic.org
