Stefan Monnier <[email protected]> writes:

>>>> We'd also prefer a more common format, e.g. xz instead of lzip (which
>>>> isn't supported by our standard unpacker), but this is a minor issue.
>> This might also be difficult due to storage issues.
>
> I find `lzip` to be much better behaved (which probably just means "more
> like the other tools with which I'm familiar"), which is why I chose it.
> I think it's also a bit closer philosophically to GNU.

How so?  Their command lines act the same.
-- 
Arsen Arsenović

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to