Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > So, text patterns that come naturally, and are also shared by a > significant number of people may as well be supported.
"[PATCH]:" is already supported by BARK: https://tracker.orgmode.org/?q=%5BPATCH%5D%3A&types=patch&open=0 Over the years, we have 805 contributors using the convention and only 15 of them using "[PATCH]:", most of these 15 contributors are one-time contributors. Because Pedro also used the "normal" form, I thought it was just an oversight, which is no big deal. I don't really see a pattern of more and more regular contributors using "[PATCH]:". Also, if we allow more of "[PATCH]: ...", the next question might be: "Why not allowing "[PATCH]: topic: ... ?" But again, back to your main point, BARK already allows "[PATCH]:". -- Bastien
