Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > I replied mostly because you commented for Pedro and now for Earl in > short sequence. That looked strange to me.
I allowed myself to enounce this recommendation twice to make sure each contributor received it, but I definitely don't want to nag anyone, this is a minor issue - preparing and sharing the patch is what matters! > Sure. That's expected. Regular contributors usually learn the common > conventions used on the list. Yes, I was just reiterating the common convention to make sure no one was confused. I'm done here :) -- Bastien
