Bastien <[email protected]> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > >> So, text patterns that come naturally, and are also shared by a >> significant number of people may as well be supported. > > "[PATCH]:" is already supported by BARK: > https://tracker.orgmode.org/?q=%5BPATCH%5D%3A&types=patch&open=0
Got it. Then, I have no concerns. > Over the years, we have 805 contributors using the convention and > only 15 of them using "[PATCH]:", most of these 15 contributors are > one-time contributors. Because Pedro also used the "normal" form, > I thought it was just an oversight, which is no big deal. I replied mostly because you commented for Pedro and now for Earl in short sequence. That looked strange to me. > I don't really see a pattern of more and more regular contributors > using "[PATCH]:". Sure. That's expected. Regular contributors usually learn the common conventions used on the list. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
