Morgan Smith <[email protected]> writes: >> Maybe even uppkg. make repro is aimed to "just work", so more >> automation should be beneficial. > > We haven't even merged this patchset and it's already showing > quirks from its evolution :P > > The only reason we have a separate uppkg and checkpkg is because > originally uppkg was going to do a network call. Now that it's > entirely local we should just replace checkpkg with uppkg > everywhere.
+1 >> This also made me think about what users are going to see after >> git clone. I think we should also update instructions to use >> git clone --recurse-submodules. WDYT? > > I'd be curious on how many people compile from the repo without > first obtaining a modern Emacs. I'm not against it but I don't > think it's necessary. Personally, I'd use the command "git clone > --recurse-submodules --shallow-submodules" AFAIK, a number of users just install Org from git clone instead of ELPA, but otherwise use stock Emacs (e.g. from Debian). I have no problem with --shallow-submodules. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
