Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On May 18, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote: > >> >> Hi, Carsten. The new changes are pushed as >> tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link >> >> I couldn't undo the basing onto tehom-master, try though I might. >> Something to do with intermediate changes that I couldn't fast-forward >> and that I probably edited wrong. So I made a separate branch, >> tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link, which is now pushed to the >> repo. So tehom-master and html-export-refactor-build-link are already >> obsolete. >> >> I moved the tests into top-level directory testing, as you asked. I'm >> going to write a separate post describing the test conventions I use. >> >> Now a question: IIUC you want a branch that has no tests, that >> "contains only the changes that would go into org". Since I develop >> tests and code at about the same time (tests slightly before code), >> I'm not sure how to arrange the branching in a maintainable way. > > Hi Tom, > > If we decide to use your emtests framework for Org on a brader basis, then > there > would be no reason to have a branch free of tests. This is only necessary > because I am supposed to apply your patches, but without the testing > framework > at the moment. > > Maybe we should just go ahead and start using emtest for Org-mode. Why don't > you go ahead and propose this in a mail to emacs-orgmode. Lets see if there > is > any resistance by people who understand more about testing than I do. If > not, > we go ahead and do it.
We had that discussion here aleady, and the result is: we have no test framework to work with. Better just do it ;) Sebastian _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
